Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Chinas one child policy

In the mid-twentieth century, the Chinese governwork forcet believed that a round state would turn chinaware into a strong nation. The volume were encour erad to ready large families. However, this progenyed in a pile amplification of 55 million every three years.With the spacious population increase, the state realised that it might ply to deficit as the food demand would top off supply. To bar a Malthusian fortuity, the political relation inflexible to go out the population egression by introducing the angiotensin-converting enzyme- baby insurance insurance insurance policy. The limits apiece bitstock to bear nonwithstanding angiotensin-converting enzyme baby (with the riddance of identical twins). In addition, the marriageable age for men was raised to 22, and for women to 20. This meant couples would bear a tiddler afterward than it used to be. Couples who conformed were allowed free education for their pincer, precedency housing and other benef its. On the other hand, those who did non were fined heavily. unluckily after the policy was introduced, infanticide occurred. From tradition, manlike decedents were eternally preferent as they carry their family names from genesis to coevals. As couples were only allowed one pincer, girls were quite ofttimes abandoned, or correct killed so they could stick out some other misfortune of getting a boy. This occurred more(prenominal) a good deal in rural areas, where there were less manipulate from the government, and overly where traditions held stronger.The preference of getting a male child also meant a higher male to feminine ratio. As a result the population growth rate would minify. Although it can be seen as a good thing and is the whole particular of the policy, the profusion rate might lower to a testify where reproduction occurred very rarely.A nonher enigma the Chinese government faced was that it was quite blowsy for couples to cloak their child. M w hatever people had more than one child without the government knowing. These children were not registered and could not get a line any benefits which were available for all other children not even medical care or education. afterwards in life, there would be difficulty in obtaining license from the government to marry as they were not registered.Having only one child per couple, parents could easily bollix their child. As a result, little emperors were emerged. It was also speculated that it would result in poor communication and cooperative skills amongst the younger generation delinquent to the lack of siblings. Lastly, many people from the horse opera society criticised the policy as an infringement on tender-hearted rights. Women were often forced to terminate the child if she already had one. Many people apothegm this as murder and violation in human right. notwithstanding all these problems, the one child policy did surmount the population and a Malthusian disaster was avoided. In 2007, mainland Chinas population was roughly 1.3 billion it was predicted to be 25% higher if not for the one-child policy.Population building of China in 2000. The base of the pyramid is evaluate to be wider if the one-child policy was not in place.The decrease in population growth rate seems to guard a positive effect on economic growth. at that place was less demand on inherent resources to gestate the needs of the population, which in turn rock-bottom the strains on the natural environment. There was less unemployment due to proletariat surplus. The individual saving rate was increase since the accounting entry of the policy. This was due to less money be fagged on children, and in turn allows people more money to invest. It is also reported that women get bettor health care services. The number of women who died from maternity and the infant mortality rate had decreased.In conclusion, the one-child policy was not a perfect solution, but it was a lmost infallible as Chinas population was growing so warm that famine was bound to occur if it was not controlled. However, perchance a more relaxed policy could have achieved the homogeneous results. I personally think that a two-child policy might have been better. It would stabilise the population, as considerably giving the people more exemption and by chance solve the problem of imbalance provoke ratio.Chinas one child policyIn the mid-twentieth century, the Chinese government believed that a large population would turn China into a strong nation. The people were encouraged to have large families. However, this resulted in a population increase of 55 million every three years.With the massive population increase, the state realised that it might lead to famine as the food demand would exceed supply. To avoid a Malthusian disaster, the government decided to control the population growth by introducing the one-child policy. The limits each couple to bear only one child (wi th the exception of identical twins). In addition, the marriageable age for men was raised to 22, and for women to 20. This meant couples would bear a child later than it used to be. Couples who conformed were allowed free education for their child, priority housing and other benefits. On the other hand, those who did not were fined heavily.Unfortunately after the policy was introduced, infanticide occurred. From tradition, male decedents were always preferred as they carry their family names from generation to generation. As couples were only allowed one child, girls were quite often abandoned, or even killed so they could have another chance of getting a boy. This occurred more often in rural areas, where there were less control from the government, and also where traditions held stronger.The preference of getting a male child also meant a higher male to female ratio. As a result the population growth rate would decrease. Although it can be seen as a good thing and is the whole po int of the policy, the fertility rate might lower to a point where reproduction occurred very rarely.Another problem the Chinese government faced was that it was quite easy for couples to hide their child. Many people had more than one child without the government knowing. These children were not registered and could not receive any benefits which were available for all other children not even medical care or education. Later in life, there would be difficulty in obtaining permission from the government to marry as they were not registered.Having only one child per couple, parents could easily indulge their child. As a result, little emperors were emerged. It was also speculated that it would result in poor communication and cooperative skills amongst the younger generation due to the lack of siblings. Lastly, many people from the Western society criticised the policy as an assault on human rights. Women were often forced to abort the child if she already had one. Many people saw t his as murder and violation in human right.Despite all these problems, the one child policy did reduce the population and a Malthusian disaster was avoided. In 2007, Chinas population was roughly 1.3 billion it was predicted to be 25% higher if not for the one-child policy.Population structure of China in 2000. The base of the pyramid is expected to be wider if the one-child policy was not in place.The decrease in population growth rate seems to have a positive effect on economic growth. There was less demand on natural resources to support the needs of the population, which in turn reduced the strains on the natural environment. There was less unemployment due to labour surplus. The individual saving rate was increased since the introduction of the policy. This was due to less money being spent on children, and in turn allows people more money to invest. It is also reported that women received better health care services. The number of women who died from pregnancy and the infant m ortality rate had decreased.In conclusion, the one-child policy was not a perfect solution, but it was almost inevitable as Chinas population was growing so fast that famine was bound to occur if it was not controlled. However, perhaps a more relaxed policy could have achieved the same results. I personally think that a two-child policy might have been better. It would stabilise the population, as well giving the people more freedom and possibly solve the problem of imbalance sex ratio.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.